This week’s question concerns the U.S. military’s right to restrict information gathered by its classified satellites. Until recently, data collected by U.S. classified satellites on asteroids and meteoroids that enter the Earth’s atmosphere was routinely made available to the scientific community. A new U.S. military policy, however, now regards all data collected by classified satellites, including information on space debris entering our atmosphere, to be secret and, therefore, not for public distribution. Scientists studying the risks posed by space debris claim that such information is vital and that restricting access to it makes no sense whatsoever.
What do you think?
Should the military restrict space debris information gathered by its classified satellites?
Submit your answer and post your comments here.
Advertisement:

60 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 22, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Bob
Why would incoming meteoriods, astroids, or space debris be classified? I haven’t a clue. Anyone know?
June 22, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Alan Kitchen
The funding for the technology that gathers this information is funded by taxpayer dollars. If the technology supplies information that does not need to have limited distribution due to national security issues, then it is clearly in the interest of the citizens of this country to have that information made available.
June 22, 2009 at 12:27 pm
hnrbnd
No, I do not think the Military should restrict such information. The military acts as the acquisition resource here for the private community, which performs the analysis. Private industry does not have the acquisition capabilities (cost justification), and DoD does not have the resources to perform analysis.
However, what concerns me more is the motivation for this policy shift. In my limited (and very ignorant) understanding, I see only three possible causes for this action:
1) pure buearocratic logic, which is an oxymoron by definition
2) something is being placed in the region that that would have national security rammifications if detailed in such a report
3) something has been discovered that, for national security reasons, has been deemed not appropriate for public knowledge
June 22, 2009 at 12:29 pm
Bill
Yes, with a size limit, so we will not disclose our resolution capabilities at this time. Evaluate this every 10 years.
June 22, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Kevin
It is amazing the amount of information that can be gleaned from disclosing objects entering the earth’s atmosphere, resolution of the satellite, size and speed of objects able to be detected and of course where “we” are looking at any given time. Just because our tax dollars paid for something does not mean we should have automatic and immediate access to it.
June 22, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Dr. Rob
Yes, it should be restricted in most cases. Our defense capabilities are already sold by our politicians for money, and divulging data of this type will do the same thing. Certain enemies of the people of the United States would garner information about our satellite systems and capabilities if we routinely divulge those capabilities. Only in time of danger should this data be made available, and then only in a way that helps the situation without compromising national defense secrets. The Federal government has the paramount job of national defense, which supercedes public safety as redards space debris/falling objects (unless the falling objects are MIRV’s).
June 22, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Steve K.
No, it shouldn’t be restricted. We are so far ahead of everyone else in technical capabilities such as this that our enemies can’t even put anything up that would be two orders of magnitude larger than our resolving power. A quote applicable to this issue went something like, “We want them to know what we can do. We don’t want them to think we are ten feet tall, we want them to think we are twenty feet tall!”
June 22, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Dr J C Guignard
I don’t know to what extent the international law of space is evolving based upon the Law of the Sea; but human-generated space debris is loosely analogous to shipwrecks, abandoned rigs, loose barges, lost buoys, and other substantial floating or submerged debris that is dangerous to oceanic, coastal and inland navigation. There is a global public interest met in charting it and making as much information as possible openly available to the entire oceangoing community (not just to the citizens of any particular seafaring country).
(I won’t dwell at length here on the fact that even remote areas of our oceans are also heavily polluted by countless tons of relatively “trivial”, small or lightweight, non-biodegradable flotsam (eg, discarded styrofoam containers and plastic 6-pack ties, as well as illegally dumped ships’ waste) that are offensive to mariners and dangerous to many kinds of marine life. There is probably not a space equivalent to that. In space, mainly because of orbital velocities, even tiny items, such as lost bolts or astronauts’ tools, could eventually kill someone or wreck or disable a very expensive space vehicle.)
But the military - even although they’re notorious for stovepiping and clinging to too many secrets, badly kept - may arguably be justified in placing some restrictions on divulging all space junk data acquired by classified satellites. This would be so if classified information about the satellite or its systems could be derived or inferred by an enemy from detailed technical (other than orbital) information released internationally about the debris itself.
June 22, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Don Ramsey
The only reason I can think of that makes sense why we might need to restrict the data is that the data released somehow allows our enemies to discern the resolving ability of our satellites’ imaging systems.
June 22, 2009 at 1:13 pm
JOHN NASH
I AGREE WITH DR. ROB!!!
June 22, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Luis
This can only be answered with another question. What are they trying to hide? If its junk, why is it classified? Since when are meteors, meteoroids, etcetera, classified? Is the moon also going to be classified soon? How about solar information? Oh no, wait, they are only trying to classify “Fastwalker” information, but the only way to do that is to classify everything…
Another reason why we know less and less about our surrounding planetary neighborhood. I’m sure the Russians, the Indian, Japanese and Chinese are not restricting that kind of information…
June 22, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Louis Dorworth
We absolutely should share all information about space debris and near earth objects. The consequences of not doing so could be catastrophic. While here on earth we are bound by borders and politics, space has no boundries, thus this is a world issue.
June 22, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Mark Avery
It is simply fascinating that the current administration finds data on asteroids and meteorids to be classified but has no problem opening the archives of the CIA to the world. It is indeed as though we are in backwardsland.
June 22, 2009 at 4:31 pm
G Szakacs
At the moment there are a limited number of agencies that really need the information on space debris. I see no problem in limiting this information to those agencies, domestic or foreign, who are not at odds with U.S. interests. As pointed out, some information about spy satellites could be gleaned from the orbital data, but this could be reduced by randomizing the time delay between detecting and reporting the objects found.
June 22, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Wayne Smith
In order to protect the integrity of our gathering information, it is necessary not to divulge what we are capable of detecting. To divulge the information wantonly would unduly compromise our technical capabilities.
June 23, 2009 at 12:47 am
JTP
The military leadership (this applies to any military or government organization) found out that their commands were providing information that was scientifically significant and that they were doing something useful. By definition, the military had to stop being helpful.
What other logical reason could there be for shutting down such a valuable stream of observations and data in defense of collisions of space debris of all kinds with earth?
June 23, 2009 at 2:55 pm
Incredulous1
WOW! Now there’s change you can believe in. “Transparency, openness and accountablility” … now where did I hear that? Wonder why that evil GW didn’t come up with this plan? Guess he was a little slow, huh?
June 24, 2009 at 2:16 am
Mary
Pretty cool post. I just came across your blog and wanted to say
that I have really enjoyed browsing your posts. Any way
I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!
June 24, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Realitycheck
We have spent billions on star wars laser technology we should use it to blow that crap out of the sky.
Plus the target practice would make money well spent on research and development and other nations may even see the worth in it.
June 25, 2009 at 3:39 pm
Suncat2000
It depends on whether or not the object the junk came from is still classified. I think simply adding the junk to our existing databases and making such information public is mostly innocuous and should not be classified. However, I agree with those who think that how the data is gathered should possibly be protected.
Realitycheck has a great idea. Let’s use our destructive testing, when necessary, to clear some of the debris.
June 25, 2009 at 9:04 pm
How I Make $5000 a Month Posting Links on Google
Loved your latest post, by the way.
June 26, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Derekp
I think i’ve seen this somewhere before…but it’s not bad at all
June 26, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Michael
Hey, have you seen this news article?
New details about Michael Jackson’s Death Emerge
I was wondering if you were going to blog about this…
July 27, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Barbie Boswell
VIP Interracial
July 27, 2009 at 10:13 pm
Barbi Blonde
Tissue Queens
July 27, 2009 at 10:14 pm
Little Caprice
White Dicks in Black Chics
July 27, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Granny Bangin
Black Cock Virgin
July 27, 2009 at 10:16 pm
Sweet Juliet
Poor Little White Girl
July 27, 2009 at 10:17 pm
Hot Russian Ass
Aaron Summers
July 27, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Gay Thug Dating
Jenna Presley
July 27, 2009 at 10:19 pm
Chloe Kiss
Jasmine Jolie
July 27, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Big League Facials
Latin Teen Pass
July 27, 2009 at 10:22 pm
Sophia Santi
Under Skirt Vids
July 27, 2009 at 10:23 pm
Girls Got Cream
Asian Sweat
July 27, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Tiny Miley
Gay Fuck
July 27, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Holly Randall
Ariel Rebel
July 27, 2009 at 10:26 pm
Monster Cock Fuck Fest
Toying Sluts
July 27, 2009 at 10:27 pm
Moxxie Maddron
Cofi Milan
July 27, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Retro Ramming
Euro Humpers
July 27, 2009 at 10:29 pm
Sexa
Selina 18
July 27, 2009 at 10:30 pm
Knocked Up Nikki
Brazilian Bitches
July 27, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Young Jess
All Porn Sites Pass
July 27, 2009 at 10:32 pm
Cum Stained Casting Couch
Christy Cummings
July 27, 2009 at 10:33 pm
Best 18 Girls
Try Teens
July 27, 2009 at 10:35 pm
Isis Lee
MP Pass
July 27, 2009 at 10:36 pm
Ordinary Sluts
Big Boobs POV
July 27, 2009 at 10:37 pm
Twinky Bottoms
My First Sex Teacher
July 27, 2009 at 10:38 pm
Young And Fresh
American Daydreams
July 27, 2009 at 10:39 pm
Fuzz Bumpers
Pixies Pillows
July 27, 2009 at 10:40 pm
Busty Kelly Kay
Bang That Ass
July 27, 2009 at 10:41 pm
Karina Hart
Danni Virgin
July 27, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Tasty Tara
Scoreland
July 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm
Kitty Leigh
Burrito Bitches
July 27, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Granny Got Laid
Cotton Bottom Club
July 27, 2009 at 10:46 pm
Date A Teen
HandJob Next Door
July 27, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Femdom Chamber
Gay Black Cinema
July 27, 2009 at 10:48 pm
Adult Metal
Extreme Sophia
July 27, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Chubby And Sexy
Brea Lynn
July 27, 2009 at 10:50 pm
Anal Outlaws
Crazy Old Moms
July 27, 2009 at 10:51 pm
Pantyhose Amateurs
Lacey Alexandra