Last week’s question concerned a report about an Internet clearinghouse of cell phone numbers available for purchase. The company running the site says it’s a public service to help parents check on whom their kids are calling or conduct a background check on a nanny, but others believe it’s a violation of privacy. We asked whether you think cell phone numbers should be sold, and you were emphatic in your response, with 90% voting NO.
Here’s a sample of your comments:
“Under NO circumstances do I want my cell phone number published or shared. If this is allowed to happen, I will be forced to radically change the way I use my cell phone. This could include turning it off or call screening.” - D. Bassett
“If the company selling the cell phone numbers was genuinely concerned for children’s safety, they would be willing to provide this information without charge, not profit from a ‘perceived’ menace.” - E. Gonzales
“Cell phone numbers should not be sold to anyone willing to plunk down a few dollars. This could open the door for unsolicited advertising received on our cell phones with us picking up the tab.” - B. Loe
“Recent U.S. privacy laws have enabled, not prevented, identity theft crime. Cell phone number databases are one more tool for criminal exploitation.” - J. Davis
“Cell phone numbers should be treated like regular telephone numbers. The owner of the number should allow it to be published or unlisted, however they prefer.” - R. Hoffman
This week, we turn our attention to a Los Angeles Times editorial that questioned NASA’s priorities, suggesting the agency was wrong in cancelling climate and other Earth observation projects in favor of manned spaceflight. What do you think? If budgets remain flat in coming years, NASA will continue to face tough choices. Should the agency redirect funds toward Earth studies and problems such as global warming, or continue to push forward with missions to the moon and Mars? Submit your answer here.
Recent Comments