Last week, we asked INSIDERs if you thought NASA’s decision to add a shuttle mission in 2008 to service the Hubble Space Telescope was worth the risk. An overwhelming 94 percent of you said it was worth it to keep Hubble operational, with only 6 percent saying no. Here’s some of what you had to say:
“I fully support the decision by NASA to add a Hubble repair mission. Exploring space will always be dangerous — it is not mankind’s natural environment. While unnecessary risk should be avoided, the continued ascent of mankind will always require that people be willing to step forth and face the dangers of the unknown.” C.K. Andersen
“Not only should NASA service the Hubble, their roadmap needs to include the means of performing on-orbit service missions, for Hubble or other high-value platforms. I would be extremely disappointed if we lost all ability to perform such missions after the retirement of the shuttle.” B. Haselrick
“Hubble is worth repairing and updating. I wish when I was younger we had this type of technology. My daughters both love astronomy and are fascinated with Hubble’s images and discoveries. In another 20 years, if they continue this love, who knows what we will discover, or what they will discover.” B. Hager
This week’s question concerns a proposed ban in all New York City restaurants on the use of trans fat in an attempt to keep the population heart-healthy. Many restaurant owners are concerned that their food will not taste the same with replacement ingredients.
Should we be allowed to eat unhealthy food if we choose, or should the government make that choice for us through food bans? Should the government decide what we’re allowed to eat? Submit your answer at:
http://link.abpi.net/l.php?20061113A12
Recent Comments